The Rolex GMT-Master II 16710, affectionately known as the "Pepsi" or "Coke" depending on the bezel insert color, holds a special place in the hearts of many watch enthusiasts. Its iconic design, robust build, and compelling history make it a highly sought-after timepiece. However, the comfort of its original bracelet, especially in varying weather conditions, is a frequently discussed topic. Many owners, particularly those experiencing wrist swelling in warmer months like the UK summer, find themselves seeking alternatives to improve the wearability of their beloved 16710. This article will delve into the challenges of the original 16710 bracelet, explore the possibility of fitting a Glidelock clasp or a 97200 bracelet, and discuss various aspects of the 16710, including its production years, pricing, and overall appeal.
The Original 16710 Bracelet and its Limitations:
The Rolex 16710 originally came fitted with a solid link Oyster bracelet, typically reference 78360 or variations thereof, featuring a simple deployant clasp. While undeniably robust and a hallmark of Rolex quality, this clasp lacks the adjustability needed for fluctuating wrist sizes. This is particularly problematic in climates with significant temperature variations, like the UK, where summer heat can cause noticeable wrist swelling. The lack of micro-adjustment means that what might be a comfortable fit in the morning can become uncomfortably tight later in the day. This tightness can lead to discomfort, restricted blood flow, and even skin irritation for some wearers.
Exploring Alternatives: Glidelock and 97200 Bracelets
The question posed by many 16710 owners is whether a Glidelock clasp or a 97200 bracelet (commonly found on modern GMT-Master II models) can be fitted to their vintage piece. The answer is nuanced.
Glidelock Clasp: The Glidelock clasp, introduced on later Rolex models, offers significant advantages in terms of adjustability. Its ingenious system allows for approximately 20mm of extension in 2mm increments, providing a far superior fit throughout the day and across varying weather conditions. However, directly swapping the clasp is not a straightforward process. While the end links might be compatible, the bracelet itself needs careful consideration. The Glidelock clasp is designed to work seamlessly with the specific bracelet architecture of newer models. Attempting to fit a Glidelock onto an older 78360 bracelet might require significant modifications, potentially compromising the bracelet's integrity and voiding any warranty. A professional watchmaker with expertise in Rolex bracelets is essential for this undertaking. The costs involved, including purchasing the Glidelock clasp and the professional fitting, should be carefully weighed against the benefits.
97200 Bracelet: This bracelet, often considered superior in terms of comfort and adjustability to the original 16710 bracelet, represents a more comprehensive upgrade. It features the Glidelock clasp, as well as a subtly different link design that many find more comfortable against the skin. However, the challenges are amplified with this option. The 97200 bracelet is not a direct drop-in replacement. The end links are not interchangeable, requiring either sourcing matching end links (a potentially difficult and expensive task) or potentially modifying the existing end links, again a job best left to a skilled watchmaker. The overall cost of acquiring a 97200 bracelet and having it professionally fitted will likely be considerably higher than simply fitting a Glidelock clasp.
Weighing the Pros and Cons:
current url：https://ndrxwe.d278y.com/blog/rolex-16710-clasp-14874